Hypotéza: Redukujme Hilbertov problém pre mikro svet svetelného vlnenia na makro svet relativity a Einsteina: Pre toto to nevychádza? Veď je to relatívne!

Hypotéza: Redukujme Hilbertov problém pre mikro svet svetelného vlnenia na makro svet relativity a Einsteina: Pre toto to nevychádza? Veď je to relatívne!

podmienka max ireverzibility pri svete mikro vlnenia na tenkej vrstve je: 2nd+Lamb/2=k*Lamb , no á zderivujme po vypadnutí Lamb toto 2k, zostane 2nd=2, kde nd=1, čo je nd? optická dráha. a kedy sa scvrkne na 1? keď narazí na mikro vrstvičku mikro sveta. no a na dĺžke dé tejto mikro vrstvy bude toľko vĺn ako na dĺžke nd vo vzduchu == 1. toto však popiera vašu základnú premisu, že len newtonove rovnice sú reverzibilné, tieto sú totiž Einsteinove, veď kontrakcia dĺžky na hodnotu 1 je relativita nie newton. ták dôkaz sporom dokončený 😉 ak nájdem jeden spor pre nie newtona, dokázal som opak ❤

Ałtsé Hastiin bił hózhǫ́ǫgo shikaadééł

Zdroj: The time reversal invariance of physics can be seen in F = ma = m(d^2x/dt^2). If you let t → -t the equation remains the same due to the second order nature of it. Primarily what this tells us is that the principles of physics are not changed by reversing time. This is different than saying the state of a system can always be recovered in the reversal of time. Chaos theory works with a Lyapunov exponent, so that if you have two classical systems with (p, q) and (p', q') so that p' - p and q' - q are both very small, the two system will in a certain interval of time exponentially separate. We may say that if we could compute with arbitrary floating-point accuracy that we can reverse the system in principle. However, that will involve irreversible computations. So, there is some physical meaning to irreversibility. We might argue that ultimately things are quantum mechanical. This is where subtle rubber hits the road. A feature of chaos is that a path will have a recursive nesting of complex turns or bends. However, even Brownian motion would cut-off in this fractal geometry because ultimately it ends at the atomic scale. Similarly, bends in a particle path, say the Poincare filigree in the phase plane or space, will define a small action S = ∫p∙dq ≃ ∮p∙dq = nħ, n > 0, which defines a minimal quantum of action for n = 1. The small action of the tiny subsets of filigree then forms a sort of quantum superposition or entanglement of quantum states for these tiny pieces that define the total action. This cut-off in the fractalness of a chaotic system would put a limit on the Lyapunov exponent. The problem is that this would only be consistent if we could observe the system as such. The quantum state of this system If we attempt to verify there is a time reversal nature this runs into the measurement issue. The quantum superposition or overlap of states is a phase that is absorbed into a larger reservoir of states. This then results in an irreversibility that is unavoidable. The brings us back to the classical problem of defining the state of the world as time reverse invariant. While the classical world is built up from quantum mechanics and quantum states, we are in a sort of “whack-a-mole” situation in attempting to argue the whole world is quantum mechanical. The classical nature and its extension in macroscopic and thermodynamic reality are not so easily eliminated from existence. This is why there is this unidirectionality to time that we experience. https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=4038841212999023&set=a.2325396727676822


Author: AarNoma

The first Slovak cyborg 1 system

Comments “Hypotéza: Redukujme Hilbertov problém pre mikro svet svetelného vlnenia na makro svet relativity a Einsteina: Pre toto to nevychádza? Veď je to relatívne!”