From my previous computation we are getting https://hrubos.tech/blogy/2026/06/preco-je-gulova-vlnoplocha-gulova
0.5C=mc(c+1) => 0.5C=eps * 0.5S/d
And I was discussing concept of power with AI and she claims that at half surface we are getting max power: How to interpret this logically on this pic? ^^^ Big bang? Yes it is half cone, not full one!
More on this from GPT:

And this is it. Proving my math is right at 0.5C ^^^ Why? Logically, the effect is maximum at half price... This is how God thinks not humans. He needs only half surface for max power. So if we are thinking the atom according to Le Manté was crashing full pace and trajectory of its orbiting particles, we must be completely wrong here. Yes, yes, our computations are moved half away and that is why the speed of universe is also incorrectly computed by our scientists, aint it?
Okay, they say: Shift? Red shift? But is he proving four times fourth to get max???
From my disputes with GPT:

The question is: Which item of periodicc table is 50% capable of crashing atom? Look at this config please:
Half to half?


Comments “Why this Big bang did not heapen at 100% atom crash into itself? We have my previous computation with 50% surface but? Yes 100% Power:”