áh yes 3 conditions: a+b+c=42; a/b+c/b=42(0-b); a/c+b/c=42(0-c) ; painted as https://www.desmos.com/calculator/nrtycbkwzc That’s everything to realize: I’ll paint: Why is that? Imagine what we are [...] Read more

it is log ratio, he changed 2^x+2^y=640 //2^x => 1+2^y/2^x=640/2^x => now lets simply use pow rules 1+2^(y-x)=640/2^x //* 2^x => 2^x(1+2^(y-x))=640 => 1=2^0 => 2^x*2^(y-x)=640 ✌️🧑‍🎓🫵💪 [...] Read more

[...] Read more

^^^ All right they say I’m wrong, let’s ask gemmini, then why she says the same? 2x0=1x0, picture: [...] Read more

^^^ A kde to vidieť najlepšie? Predsa v trojuholníkoch totožných: CFE a SFE, sú len otočené a zväčšené :) [...] Read more

^^^ [...] Read more

dnes sme diskutovali s prof, kde budú svietiť žiarovky menej: já som to riešil klasickým kirchhoffovým zákonom >+ prúd sa rozteká v uzle na 3 menšie, keďže I=I1++I3, kde I1..3<I, teda VĽAVO [...] Read more

Interesting finding: if you curve time space in these ratios it is L=L_0* gamma=sqrt(1-1.75^2/3^2)=0.6 =>4/6=2/3 and ratio n^x=xn preserves same gamma == cca 2/3 = 1.75/0.03 is 4/6, my new story [...] Read more

-sinx +c1 --sinx+c1 = 1/4(-sinx +c2 + sinx +c2); 2c1=0.5c2; => https://www.desmos.com/calculator/dnymopsvnc => c1=c2 =>0 => 0+0=0 [...] Read more

Yesterday, at the annual Rencontres de Moriond conference taking place in La Thuile, Italy, the LHCb collaboration at CERN reported a new milestone in our understanding of the subtle yet profound [...] Read more